Getting out of a hole is the same, whether its the hole you fell in or the one dug yourself and jumped in

Lets face it. everybody has problems, It fell on you or you went looking for it. But the basic skill to get you out of it is the same. is one my other sites talking about a set of skills to solve problems, It's a tool so that you can use for your own or use it to help someone.

The world will always feel empty because it's our emotions that fill the void.

Originally, "the world is really empty, it's our emotions that make it full." A variation "the world is really empty, it's our emotions that fill it." People who feel the world is empty are often not interfacing or interacting with others, be it electronically or face to face. While face to face is better, honest communication via phones, social media or messaging apps can be as meaningful. Notice the use of the word 'honest'. Honest communication are filled with emotions. When humans are able to connect emotionally, whether it positive or negative, their worlds are no longer empty. Negative emotions have a place. It prevents us from falling prey, warning us of danger. Positive emotions are most fulfilling. The best people are able to take negativity and create positivity.  

Those looking for something absolute in our lives, will find absolutely nothing.

Absolute means perfection or something you can't find fault with or something that unconditional, not limited by any constraints that otherwise effects it lesser contemporaries. In almost everything in this world, imperfections can be found. In fact, what is perfect exists in ideals and ideas, in belief and in abstract. Sincere people looking the absolute are maybe looking for absolution. This gap is where the unscrupulous prey, fooling the pilgrims looking for release from guilt into subjugation of belief or even more guilt.

Being right some of time, fuels all full-time skeptics

James Randi with some expensive art (Photo credit: Wikipedia ) If you are skeptical all the time, you would be right at least once. Being skeptic doesn't means being against anythings nor does it forward another alternative. Being skeptic is creating doubt around something but not enough to dismiss is outright. You can even go ahead dismissing something, knowing that if the that thing fails just once, you are proven right. Your position is save even if that thing is just right only one time. The skeptic can be right once to be proven true, the target of the skepticism, on the other hand, cannot fail. The position is non-committal. If you are wrong, then you can just shrug it off because you didn't say it was wrong in the first place. But you have gloating rights when your skepticism is proved justified, even though only in hindsight.

Blessed are, those who share their blessings in silence

In a world where vanity is a virtue, it can be hard to be sincere to oneself. Where the action of doing good clashes with the desire to be a visible example of good. Being visible doing something means allowing others to join and do likewise. A kinship of common action creates community. In community, we find acceptance, affirmation and support. While visible is the start to this path, the path is not without devious junctions. The hunger the first drives us can cloud good judgement. Being visible is becoming the example. And becoming the example does not require self-promotion but recognition. And while recognition should not be the goal, preparing to take advantage of recognition, is. Be hungry still. Photo by: unsplash-logo Elaine Casap

I'm don't share my knowledge because I know more, I know more because I share my knowldege

Nothing is an example of the mastery of a knowledge than the ability to teach it. Answering questions increases the knowledge of both person who asked the question and the person providing an answer. Conversely, hoarding knowledge is a sign of little one knows, and hoarding the knowledge is a way to keep something for themselves as a way to show some things others know not of.

If eveyone is a leader, who is left following?

I love it how empowerment is being commercialized through "the lie of leadership". Like "individuality" before it, it's being packaged, dolled-up, re-processed, promoted and available at the right price. While the irony of "individuality" was that while following the urge and advice from everywhere to be a unique individual, you just ended up looking like someone else, one of exactly like others of a group (or someone touted as a model of individuality), the "lie of leadership" plays up the old "youth before age" schism as the drive to be a leader, eschewing experience for cookie cutter slogans and pop-philosophy. No more clearer is this exemplified in the TV series Silicon Valley. Being from the industry, the caricatures are painfully accurate, Dilbert-esque and enough for me to stop watching (let's face it, we watch TV to get away from reality, not have it thrown in the face). But in the tunnel-vision of "leadership&qu